You can crop as well as downscale the 6k image to 4k and reduce digital noise which is a nice option. If you already have EF access the 6k is great and you don't have to worry about losing image quality by using a speedbooster. Now that being said the 6k has less of a crop factor which is nice (about 1.85 on the 4k, about 1.58 on the 6k if I recall). I didn't think of these things when I bought my 6k. The 6k does not have 4k blackmagic RAW, you can only shoot 4k in prores currently on it.

Adapting vintage lenses such as Canon FD to EF is a huge pain due to the flange distance of the EF mount by nature. Consider this for example:Īn anamorphic lens for EF would cost about 10x more. I know I won't be able to control the lens electronically from the camera, but can I assume if I manually selected an aperture of f4, it would turn into an aperture of f2.The 4k has a number of high end lenses at an affordable price. That way, my gf could use it on the Canon body directly and I could use it on the pocket with a dumb Canon to MFT adaptor to make use of its maximal focal length possible.īut the question is, could I use this manual Canon FD lens converted to EF with my metabones speedbooster BMPCC/Canon EF, the one I use with my beloved Sigma 18-35, and benefit from the increased 1 2/3stop aperture and 0.58x wider focal lenght? However, since I have to buy two adapters - the FD to EF for the canon 400D and the FD to MFT for the pocket - I'm considering sending it to the lens doctor and have him convert the 70-210's FD mount to EF. Of course, I intend to use it on the bmpcc. She's not very happy with the limited focal length and she wanted to try a telelens on an old canon 400D body we have. The lens is mainly for my girlfriend, who owns a fuji x100t. I own the original BMPCC and have just purchased a Canon FD 70-210 f4. I'm a bmcuseruser, but it doesn't seem to be working properly.

Bmpcc 4k canon fd